Program boundary
Identify the non-restricted application, requirement authority, and any manual review conditions.
Aerospace & Defense request guide
Aerospace requests, defined before review.
Share non-restricted part context, drawings, materials, critical features, documentation needs, and program requirements. Pearson reviews eligibility and request scope before any manufacturing path is considered.
- Program review required
- Documentation defined
- Timing reviewed per request
Capability review
This page describes common request types. Available processes, equipment, tolerances, inspection, documentation, and fulfillment are confirmed for each quote.
Overview
Start with the program and the part.
Aerospace requests are easier to review when part function, revision authority, critical geometry, material identity, special processes, and the expected evidence package arrive together.
Part definition
Pair the model with a controlled drawing that identifies datums, interfaces, and critical features.
Evidence intent
List requested material records, inspection content, special-process records, and marking instructions.
Industry request review
Restricted or regulated work is not accepted through the standard quote workflow. Contact Pearson for a manual eligibility review before sharing controlled technical data. Review does not guarantee acceptance.
Quote inputs
Inputs for a useful aerospace review.
Provide what is controlled, identify what is still open, and avoid assumptions about eligibility or documentation.
- Request contexts
- Development parts, non-restricted production requests, test fixtures, and ground-support tooling
- Material inputs
- Specified grade, temper or condition, stock form, approved substitutions, and material-record requirements
- Critical requirements
- Datum scheme, CTQ features, edge-break notes, special processes, marking, and acceptance criteria
- Helpful files
- Current STEP or IGES model, controlled PDF drawing, revision, quantities, and documentation list
Interactive request review
Explore an aerospace request before submission.
Use the three markers to connect program context, part definition, and acceptance evidence.
Aerospace & Defense request feature map
Bracket interfaces and neutral inspection setup
Illustrative planning reference only. Markers do not establish part function, capability, compliance, acceptance, or suitability.
Aerospace & Defense request review
What should the request explain?
Choose a marker to review the supporting inputs.
Frame and fixture context
State the non-restricted application, requirement authority, revision, quantity, and program-review boundary.
- Application context
- Requirement authority
- Revision and quantity
Helpful request detail
Begin with a non-sensitive summary and the current document index.
Requirements and fulfillment are confirmed only after request review.
Request contexts
Common aerospace request contexts.
Choose the context that best explains the request; acceptance still depends on manual review.
Prototype and test articles
DevelopmentDefine test intent, controlled interfaces, expected revisions, and the evidence needed for evaluation.
Requirements review
ReviewIdentify governing documents, supplier qualifications, special processes, and program eligibility questions.
Eligible repeat requests
ProductionProvide the approved baseline, change status, quantities, records, and acceptance instructions.
Ground-support tooling
ToolingExplain use, locating features, loads, interfaces, marking, and inspection expectations.
Quote review flow
From non-sensitive summary to reviewed baseline.
The review keeps program boundaries and manufacturing assumptions visible before acceptance.
- 01
Share the controlled request
Provide the current drawing, model, revision, aerospace and defense context, quantity, and target timing.
- 02
Review requirements and authority
Identify governing documents, precedence, approved substitutions, restricted data, and customer-controlled decisions.
- 03
Map process and evidence needs
Connect material, geometry, interfaces, process history, finish, inspection, documentation, and packaging requirements.
- 04
Confirm the quoted baseline
Pearson confirms accepted scope, routing, records, timing, and open questions before work proceeds.
Request readiness
Six details that improve aerospace review.
Use the drawing and request notes to make functional intent and evidence needs explicit.
Design intent before assumptions
- 01
Define the datum scheme.
Connect datums to assembly interfaces and identify only the relationships that control function.
- 02
Explain tool-access limits.
Identify trapped features, deep pockets, thin walls, and any allowed alternate feature approach.
- 03
Name material condition.
State grade, temper or condition, stock form, substitution authority, and required material records.
- 04
Complete edge-break notes.
Identify sealing, bearing, handling, and intentionally sharp edges instead of relying on a blanket note.
- 05
Control special processes.
Provide the required process, revision, masking areas, affected surfaces, and evidence request.
- 06
Define documentation level.
List first-article, inspection, material, marking, serialization, and approval records requested for review.
Materials
Material guides for aerospace requests.
Use these guides for request vocabulary; grade, condition, evidence, and route remain project-specific.
Material guide
Aluminum
Reference 6061 and 7075 grade, temper, stock form, interfaces, and finish notes.
View materialMaterial guide
Stainless steel
Reference precipitation-hardening or corrosion-related requirements without assuming process fit.
View materialMaterial guide
Engineering plastics
Define polymer grade, condition, stability, interfaces, and environmental context.
View materialMaterial guide
Copper
Define alloy, electrical or thermal function, joining limits, and finish requirements.
View materialRelated services
Related aerospace request guides.
Explore process guides, then let the reviewed drawing determine the manufacturing path.
CNC Milling
Review milled geometry and drawing inputs.
Surface Grinding
Review flatness and surface relationships.
EDM Machining
Review intricate or hard-material feature requests.
Inspection
Review inspection and documentation inputs.
CNC Turning
Review shafts, pins, sleeves, and concentric features.
Assembly & Testing
Review assembly and acceptance requirements.
FAQ
Aerospace request questions.
These answers describe the review boundary; they do not establish program eligibility or acceptance.
A manufacturing path is considered only after capability, supplier, documentation, and program requirements are reviewed. The proposed path is confirmed before an eligible request proceeds.
Restricted or regulated work is not accepted through the standard quote workflow. Contact Pearson for a manual eligibility review before sharing controlled technical data. Review does not guarantee acceptance.
List the requested material, inspection, first-article, marking, and special-process records. Scope and evidence are reviewed before acceptance.
Identify functional datums, interfaces, and CTQ relationships on the controlled drawing. Achievable requirements are assessed during review.
Provide a non-sensitive summary, current model and drawing, material condition, quantities, target timing, and documentation list.
Do not share controlled technical data through the standard workflow. Begin with a manual eligibility review and follow the resulting instructions.
Start with the request
Start with a non-sensitive aerospace summary.
Describe the application and review needs without controlled technical data. Pearson will respond with the appropriate next step.
Request an eligibility review