Start from available evidence
A model, drawing, sketch, clear photos, key measurements, or an existing sample can begin the discussion when the known requirements and open questions are separated clearly.
Manual machining services
A one-off component, repair, replacement part, fixture, adapter, or mixed-feature prototype may begin with a model, drawing, sketch, photos, or an existing sample. Share the current condition, geometry, datums, mating relationships, access constraints, finish, and inspection context so the request can be organized and a project path confirmed before acceptance.

Capability review
This page describes common request types. Available processes, equipment, tolerances, inspection, documentation, and fulfillment are confirmed for each quote.
Overview
Manual machining requests often combine incomplete source information, low quantity, existing-part condition, and features approached from more than one direction. A useful request identifies the starting reference, raw or current condition, geometry to retain or change, functional datums, support and contact zones, feature access, mating relationships, material, finish, and inspection intent.
A model, drawing, sketch, clear photos, key measurements, or an existing sample can begin the discussion when the known requirements and open questions are separated clearly.
Datum faces, allowed contact zones, protected surfaces, access directions, current wear or damage, and features that must remain unchanged belong in the files.
Mating interfaces, fits, threads, bores, patterns, feature relationships, finish areas, measurement conditions, and documentation expectations should be stated instead of inferred.
Fulfillment review
Requests are reviewed manually. The fulfillment route and availability are confirmed before acceptance.
Quote inputs
You do not need every answer before submitting. Share what is known and mark the rest for follow-up.
Interactive manual-machining review
Select a feature on the used bearing block to see what the photos, model, sketch, or drawing should communicate before the project path is confirmed.

Sample manual-machining review map
The numbered markers match the review features and guidance panel.
Illustrative example only; wear and markers identify review areas, not original dimensions, material condition, process approval, or tolerance.
Manual-machining feature review
Select a review feature to see the details that help clarify the request.
A used component can explain function and history, but observed wear, prior changes, and intended geometry need to be separated before it becomes the machining reference.
Helpful drawing detail
Photograph the complete sample with a scale, mark keep and change areas, and include mating-part dimensions or assembly context when available.
Process fit, equipment fit, achievable tolerances, inspection, documentation, fulfillment, and timing are confirmed from the project information during quote review.
Capabilities
These examples help identify the likely starting point. Process fit, equipment fit, achievable tolerances, and availability are confirmed from the project files.
One-off turning and prismatic-component requests for shafts, pins, bushings, blocks, brackets, plates, spacers, collars, and adapters reviewed from their starting reference, geometry, functional datums, mating interfaces, access, finish, and inspection intent.
Worn, damaged, modified, incomplete, or obsolete-component requests reviewed from their current condition, intended change, retained and protected surfaces, assembly context, functional relationships, and acceptance intent.
Fixture, jig, adapter, setup aid, gauge-related, and prototype-support requests reviewed from their locating scheme, interfaces, access, adjustment, fastening, revision, and use context.
Round and prismatic geometry, broad faces, bores, shoulders, slots, pockets, holes, threads, patterns, edge requirements, finish areas, inspection context, and documentation expectations reviewed together.
Quote workflow
A short, human-managed review keeps current condition, setup constraints, mixed features, functional relationships, and open questions visible before work is accepted.
Upload the model, drawing, sketch, photos, key measurements, material information, quantity, mating context, and known functional requirements; note whether an existing sample is available.
Starting or current condition, datums, support and contact zones, access, retained geometry, round and prismatic features, critical relationships, finish, and inspection intent are organized for follow-up.
Process fit, equipment fit, achievable tolerances, sample-review needs, fulfillment, timing, and remaining questions are resolved before acceptance.
Approved files and requirements become the reference point for project communication and requirement control.
Request readiness
Clear physical and functional intent is more useful than assuming a method or treating worn sample geometry as the final requirement.
Use a model for shape and a drawing or sketch for dimensions, datums, threads, fits, finishes, revisions, and inspection intent; add annotated photos when an existing part matters.
Identify the stock form or original reference, current wear, damage, distortion, or previous changes, and the geometry to restore, replace, retain, protect, or deliberately modify.
Show which faces, bores, diameters, shoulders, edges, or holes locate the part and connect every critical fit, pattern, and interface to the references that control assembly.
Identify allowed support and clamping areas, keep-clear regions, protected surfaces, and the top, side, end, bore, underside, or inspection access needed for each feature.
Specify round features, faces, bores, shoulders, slots, pockets, holes, threads, patterns, transitions, edges, and depths with their functional relationships and mating context.
Identify the material and current condition, quantity, revision or repeat intent, close requirements tied to function, finish areas, measurement condition, acceptance intent, and documentation needs.
Materials
Grade, form, current condition, finish, and availability are confirmed for each request.
One-off bracket, plate, block, spacer, shaft, fixture, adapter, and prototype-aid requests where grade, stock form, datum, fit, feature, edge, and finish intent need review.
6061-T6 · 7075-T6 · MIC-6 examples
View materialShaft, pin, bushing, bracket, plate, fitting, adapter, and repair-related requests where the exact grade, current condition, access, fit, sequence, and finish belong in the review.
303 · 304 · 316/316L examples
View materialFixture, jig, gauge-related, pin, bushing, tooling, wear-detail, and repair requests where grade, condition, allowance, datum, sequence, and final geometry need review.
A2 · D2 · O1 · H13 examples
View materialBearing block, housing, base, bracket, repair, and replacement-component requests where grade, casting condition, cleanup allowance, datum, support, and finish intent need review.
Gray · ductile · Ni-Resist examples
View materialFAQ
A STEP or STP model and matching PDF drawing are a strong starting pair. A dimensioned sketch or multiple clear photos can also begin the request. Add key dimensions, material information, quantity, current condition, mating context, datums, fits, threads, intended changes, setup constraints, finish, inspection or documentation needs, and target timing when known.
One-off turned and prismatic parts, repairs, rework, replacement components, fixtures, jigs, adapters, prototype aids, and mixed-feature components may be submitted. Process fit, equipment fit, achievable requirements, sample-review needs, and availability are confirmed from the project information.
Multiple clear views, a reference scale, key measurements, mating-part context, and notes about wear, damage, prior changes, and intended function can begin the review. Additional measurements, a model, a drawing, or an approved requirement record may be needed before acceptance; sample-review availability is confirmed during quoting.
Identify the functional locating surfaces, allowed support and clamping areas, keep-clear regions, protected faces, required access directions, and relationships among round features, broad faces, bores, shoulders, slots, pockets, holes, threads, and patterns.
Tie close requirements and finish areas to part function, then state the datum reference, acceptance intent, measurement condition, and documentation needs. Process fit, equipment fit, achievable tolerances, inspection scope, and availability are confirmed during quote review.
Requests are reviewed manually. The fulfillment route and availability are confirmed before acceptance.
Start with the files you have
Share the model, drawing, sketch, photos, key dimensions, current condition, and known functional requirements. Pearson will follow up on the details that still need confirmation.
Request a manual-machining quote